<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aftermath: Population Zero</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/</link>
	<description>Look Dead</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sharpshooter</title>
		<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-122109</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharpshooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/#comment-122109</guid>
		<description>fullmetal d-ross on 31 Oct 2008 at 12:07 am # 

I think one of the larger problems here is, yeah, it’s great to have a zombie action plan, but when it comes down to it: can you really pull it off?

that is why we practice. we have some time so we need to use it!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fullmetal d-ross on 31 Oct 2008 at 12:07 am # </p>
<p>I think one of the larger problems here is, yeah, it’s great to have a zombie action plan, but when it comes down to it: can you really pull it off?</p>
<p>that is why we practice. we have some time so we need to use it!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I'mNotInfected!</title>
		<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-120233</link>
		<dc:creator>I'mNotInfected!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/#comment-120233</guid>
		<description>Ok I agree with ZzDueceX
but not quite, sure if the virus,bacteria ETC was spread through fluid to fluid contact like in most zombie flicks we could survive with only a few problems..but what if it was like left4dead were it was airborne and only a few of us were immune, yeah we could mow them down, but eventually we would be overwhelmed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I agree with ZzDueceX<br />
but not quite, sure if the virus,bacteria ETC was spread through fluid to fluid contact like in most zombie flicks we could survive with only a few problems..but what if it was like left4dead were it was airborne and only a few of us were immune, yeah we could mow them down, but eventually we would be overwhelmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fullmetal d-ross</title>
		<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-107226</link>
		<dc:creator>fullmetal d-ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/#comment-107226</guid>
		<description>I think one of the larger problems here is, yeah, it's great to have a zombie action plan, but when it comes down to it: can you really pull it off? It's like how you can't know if you could ever kill someone until you are put IN THAT SITUATION. Also; I highly doubt the government will have any clue as to how to deal with the undead, so expect most of them to be cleaned out before they get a firm grasp of it. As for me, my choicest situation would be to first secure an island large enough to be self sustained, and live out my days without the fear of zombies breaking through my fortress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the larger problems here is, yeah, it&#8217;s great to have a zombie action plan, but when it comes down to it: can you really pull it off? It&#8217;s like how you can&#8217;t know if you could ever kill someone until you are put IN THAT SITUATION. Also; I highly doubt the government will have any clue as to how to deal with the undead, so expect most of them to be cleaned out before they get a firm grasp of it. As for me, my choicest situation would be to first secure an island large enough to be self sustained, and live out my days without the fear of zombies breaking through my fortress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufomagus</title>
		<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-47039</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufomagus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 02:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/#comment-47039</guid>
		<description>Reading through the post I think there is a very good chance of us as a species surviving - regardless of whether it is a classic z outbreak or a 28 days type of outbreak.  

One of the posts talks about quarantine, I think after a few days people will get pretty nervous about anyone with injuries, so there will probably be quarantine by default, if you know what I mean.  There will be evidence of cause and effect, people will know that a zombie inflicted injury means you become a zombie because they or those they trust will have seen and told others.  This is the way humans work, especially in a crisis.

I can seem people getting thrown out of secured areas because of scratches, people get mighty jumpy when their lives are on the line.  This sort of thing used to happen during historical plague outbreaks.  Towns would get sealed from "outsiders" and if anyone thought you might be  diseased, out you went into the wilds.  Of course that just meant the plagues spread better, but I digress.

The adjustment to a post z apocalypse is probably the easy part, surviving the initial outbreak the hardest.  Things like food supplies, fuel, medical supplies etc will diminish over time - the big problem will be fuel, get water in gasoline stores and you got problems.

Yes, being ex-military I think at least armed groups of soldiers would figure out what was going on and do some serious culling pretty quickly.  Probably set up secure compounds as well, depending on how far into chaos we fall, which in turn is determined by how quickly the "powers that be" figure out that one, there is a problem and two how to deal with it.

The serious modifier of outcomes though is from the time of initial outbreak to the time of "realisation"; figuring out what the problem is and what the solution is.  If if the infection transmission is as effective  as one bite one zombie - 10zeds could make 10 new zeds in seconds, that could equate to 1zed creating 60zeds per minute in a best case senario, this would then be exponential.  Plug that into your excel spreadsheet and then reaction time  by the government is explained.

The only really bad outlook scenario is one where the zombification carries over to animals - then, bye bye, we are done for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading through the post I think there is a very good chance of us as a species surviving - regardless of whether it is a classic z outbreak or a 28 days type of outbreak.  </p>
<p>One of the posts talks about quarantine, I think after a few days people will get pretty nervous about anyone with injuries, so there will probably be quarantine by default, if you know what I mean.  There will be evidence of cause and effect, people will know that a zombie inflicted injury means you become a zombie because they or those they trust will have seen and told others.  This is the way humans work, especially in a crisis.</p>
<p>I can seem people getting thrown out of secured areas because of scratches, people get mighty jumpy when their lives are on the line.  This sort of thing used to happen during historical plague outbreaks.  Towns would get sealed from &#8220;outsiders&#8221; and if anyone thought you might be  diseased, out you went into the wilds.  Of course that just meant the plagues spread better, but I digress.</p>
<p>The adjustment to a post z apocalypse is probably the easy part, surviving the initial outbreak the hardest.  Things like food supplies, fuel, medical supplies etc will diminish over time - the big problem will be fuel, get water in gasoline stores and you got problems.</p>
<p>Yes, being ex-military I think at least armed groups of soldiers would figure out what was going on and do some serious culling pretty quickly.  Probably set up secure compounds as well, depending on how far into chaos we fall, which in turn is determined by how quickly the &#8220;powers that be&#8221; figure out that one, there is a problem and two how to deal with it.</p>
<p>The serious modifier of outcomes though is from the time of initial outbreak to the time of &#8220;realisation&#8221;; figuring out what the problem is and what the solution is.  If if the infection transmission is as effective  as one bite one zombie - 10zeds could make 10 new zeds in seconds, that could equate to 1zed creating 60zeds per minute in a best case senario, this would then be exponential.  Plug that into your excel spreadsheet and then reaction time  by the government is explained.</p>
<p>The only really bad outlook scenario is one where the zombification carries over to animals - then, bye bye, we are done for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kasper</title>
		<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-42512</link>
		<dc:creator>Kasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/#comment-42512</guid>
		<description>Somewhere there is probably a formula for survival rate set up in a geek's excel, taking into account speed and spread. I think humanity will survive, the question is how many. If the initial police central response to the reports is too low-powered, an urban outbreak will be bad. But imagine a rural one. Small town-ships have disappeared from time to time without anyone knowing for several days (improper treatment of nitrous fertilizer have been involved in at least two such cases). If the zombies spread evenly throughout the landscape, infect a trucker or two, it all starts getting complicated. 

The current military of most countries could put down the infection, if spotted in time. But what of those that could not? In much of Europe, obtaining a gun requires at least a fair amount of paper-work, and many don't have one. I doubt the Russian military truly could contain an area the size of Siberia, or the Canadians control their huge forests. And what about the billions of Indians and Chinese, many of which are close together and poor? The US would likely face a whole new brand of unwanted immigrants from it's south, not to mention the refugees who would want to hide behind the most advanced army in the world. When they closed their borders to the refugees, transportation of illegals would become immensely more valuable, and someone infected is bound to tag along now and then, resulting in recurring "uprisings". This influx of refugees of unknown virulence could possibly collapse the big players, depending on the speed with which the zombies die out. 

I believe humanity would survive, but greatly decimated. There are too many islands in Micronesia for all to get infected, that's one. There are many very isolated, militarized, or just plain old fortified position that could last a fair while, and likely outlive the crisis. Gibraltar is pretty much a fortress, Taiwan is heavily militarized for it's size, Greenland would likely dispose of most zombies by means of weather and distance. 
I don't think big, "open" cities could be properly controlled, even by good response squads, because the zom-vir incubation time would make it difficult to trap all zombies at once. The moment people hear the authorities commanding anyone with a scratch mark to turn themselves in for quarantine, some scratches are gonna make a run for it instead, that's human nature. Some will succeed, that's the thing with large populations.

Head for the hills, and stock up on canned food. Owning a copy of "Gardening for Dummies" would surely help anyone after out-lasting the zombies in a high-casualty scenario, but many farmers live in the Middle of Nowhere, or at least Far from Anywhere. With a variety of heavy machinery, tools, dogs, frequently used muscles and livestock, I suppose farmers would likely have a decent survival rate as compared to the nurses treating the first wave of victims. With surviving food production, a very large survivor population is really quite unnecessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere there is probably a formula for survival rate set up in a geek&#8217;s excel, taking into account speed and spread. I think humanity will survive, the question is how many. If the initial police central response to the reports is too low-powered, an urban outbreak will be bad. But imagine a rural one. Small town-ships have disappeared from time to time without anyone knowing for several days (improper treatment of nitrous fertilizer have been involved in at least two such cases). If the zombies spread evenly throughout the landscape, infect a trucker or two, it all starts getting complicated. </p>
<p>The current military of most countries could put down the infection, if spotted in time. But what of those that could not? In much of Europe, obtaining a gun requires at least a fair amount of paper-work, and many don&#8217;t have one. I doubt the Russian military truly could contain an area the size of Siberia, or the Canadians control their huge forests. And what about the billions of Indians and Chinese, many of which are close together and poor? The US would likely face a whole new brand of unwanted immigrants from it&#8217;s south, not to mention the refugees who would want to hide behind the most advanced army in the world. When they closed their borders to the refugees, transportation of illegals would become immensely more valuable, and someone infected is bound to tag along now and then, resulting in recurring &#8220;uprisings&#8221;. This influx of refugees of unknown virulence could possibly collapse the big players, depending on the speed with which the zombies die out. </p>
<p>I believe humanity would survive, but greatly decimated. There are too many islands in Micronesia for all to get infected, that&#8217;s one. There are many very isolated, militarized, or just plain old fortified position that could last a fair while, and likely outlive the crisis. Gibraltar is pretty much a fortress, Taiwan is heavily militarized for it&#8217;s size, Greenland would likely dispose of most zombies by means of weather and distance.<br />
I don&#8217;t think big, &#8220;open&#8221; cities could be properly controlled, even by good response squads, because the zom-vir incubation time would make it difficult to trap all zombies at once. The moment people hear the authorities commanding anyone with a scratch mark to turn themselves in for quarantine, some scratches are gonna make a run for it instead, that&#8217;s human nature. Some will succeed, that&#8217;s the thing with large populations.</p>
<p>Head for the hills, and stock up on canned food. Owning a copy of &#8220;Gardening for Dummies&#8221; would surely help anyone after out-lasting the zombies in a high-casualty scenario, but many farmers live in the Middle of Nowhere, or at least Far from Anywhere. With a variety of heavy machinery, tools, dogs, frequently used muscles and livestock, I suppose farmers would likely have a decent survival rate as compared to the nurses treating the first wave of victims. With surviving food production, a very large survivor population is really quite unnecessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: callan mcauliffe</title>
		<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-33662</link>
		<dc:creator>callan mcauliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/#comment-33662</guid>
		<description>i do belive that the best thing to do would be, altough a very sad thing to do, kill anyone who has been bitten, get to the tops of buildings and whithout nourishment, the zombies would become slow and weak, allowing for an armoured assault from the army and any forces we have, support from other parts of the country could come in from around the citiy, exterminating roaming zombies. the lack of food could be fixed by forms of air delivery, droping crates from planes full of healthy food and communication devices.

the fact is that a zombie attack would not be that hard for the world to handle, if the whole world was at stake, blow up the town, and if not that, extinguish the zombies with heavily armoured soldiers, with all skin covered to prevent biting, no rocket launchers only heavy machine guns and armoured cars with turrets, get proper bull bars on the fronts of all assaulting vehicles, with bullet proof, unbreakable windows. air assaults with small bombs and extended millimetre bullets. helicopters flying around lloking for survivers, picking people up and dropping off soldiers, taking the people to safe cities.

we have the stuff to take down the zombies, the only problem is saving yourself, not extinguishing the zombies, it might cost alot of lives as everyone woul have to be killed, everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do belive that the best thing to do would be, altough a very sad thing to do, kill anyone who has been bitten, get to the tops of buildings and whithout nourishment, the zombies would become slow and weak, allowing for an armoured assault from the army and any forces we have, support from other parts of the country could come in from around the citiy, exterminating roaming zombies. the lack of food could be fixed by forms of air delivery, droping crates from planes full of healthy food and communication devices.</p>
<p>the fact is that a zombie attack would not be that hard for the world to handle, if the whole world was at stake, blow up the town, and if not that, extinguish the zombies with heavily armoured soldiers, with all skin covered to prevent biting, no rocket launchers only heavy machine guns and armoured cars with turrets, get proper bull bars on the fronts of all assaulting vehicles, with bullet proof, unbreakable windows. air assaults with small bombs and extended millimetre bullets. helicopters flying around lloking for survivers, picking people up and dropping off soldiers, taking the people to safe cities.</p>
<p>we have the stuff to take down the zombies, the only problem is saving yourself, not extinguishing the zombies, it might cost alot of lives as everyone woul have to be killed, everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZombieSlayer</title>
		<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-29771</link>
		<dc:creator>ZombieSlayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/#comment-29771</guid>
		<description>I feel like such a nerd for saying this, but in the MArvel Zombies story by Kirkman (author of the Walking Dead) Mr Fantastic sees the virus as the ultimate form of evolution. You no longer need your lungs or your liver to survive, the body is doing without it.

Now, in response to the slow vs fast, classic vs 28's, the problem is that depending on your mythos that you adhere to, the problems are entirely different (rigor mortis vs starvation). Frankly, I'd rather deal with running zombies that die in a month than slow walkers that will out-last you.

But what I'm "in favor" of doesn't matter in the slightest. What matters is that when the fecal matters hits the air oscillator, you remain calm, have a plan and stick to it to the best of your ability.

In response to Dr Detroit, it doesn't matter that we don't necessarily know HOW to do a lot of things (survive without electricity, grow a garden, etc). What matters is that you know ABOUT these things. Realizing that you might want to grow something is a lot smarter than never trying. At least knowing THAT things grow will allow you the forethought to put some seeds in the ground and water them on a semi-regular basis. The HOW comes in later with seasons and soil and pests etc, but simply knowing sbout these things may be enough to survive.

My biggest fear is really the fact that in situations like these, the food supplies will evaporate quickly and then people panic once again (almost as bad as Z-day) when they realize they have no food. Then every game animal within 100 miles will be dead as a door nail, poached so one person can eat a steak before he dies. Any plant worth eating berries or leaves? Gone, uprooted by some backward executive still trying to think outside the box.

If you want to survive long enough to see if the Nat Geo's or History Channel's predictions are correct? Learn to grow a garden, save some seeds, try fasting once a month to allow your body to recognize the pangs of hunger. Exercise and stay in good health. Being healthy and fit when Z-day comes could very well be the best survival choice you could make!

Stay alert. Stay alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like such a nerd for saying this, but in the MArvel Zombies story by Kirkman (author of the Walking Dead) Mr Fantastic sees the virus as the ultimate form of evolution. You no longer need your lungs or your liver to survive, the body is doing without it.</p>
<p>Now, in response to the slow vs fast, classic vs 28&#8217;s, the problem is that depending on your mythos that you adhere to, the problems are entirely different (rigor mortis vs starvation). Frankly, I&#8217;d rather deal with running zombies that die in a month than slow walkers that will out-last you.</p>
<p>But what I&#8217;m &#8220;in favor&#8221; of doesn&#8217;t matter in the slightest. What matters is that when the fecal matters hits the air oscillator, you remain calm, have a plan and stick to it to the best of your ability.</p>
<p>In response to Dr Detroit, it doesn&#8217;t matter that we don&#8217;t necessarily know HOW to do a lot of things (survive without electricity, grow a garden, etc). What matters is that you know ABOUT these things. Realizing that you might want to grow something is a lot smarter than never trying. At least knowing THAT things grow will allow you the forethought to put some seeds in the ground and water them on a semi-regular basis. The HOW comes in later with seasons and soil and pests etc, but simply knowing sbout these things may be enough to survive.</p>
<p>My biggest fear is really the fact that in situations like these, the food supplies will evaporate quickly and then people panic once again (almost as bad as Z-day) when they realize they have no food. Then every game animal within 100 miles will be dead as a door nail, poached so one person can eat a steak before he dies. Any plant worth eating berries or leaves? Gone, uprooted by some backward executive still trying to think outside the box.</p>
<p>If you want to survive long enough to see if the Nat Geo&#8217;s or History Channel&#8217;s predictions are correct? Learn to grow a garden, save some seeds, try fasting once a month to allow your body to recognize the pangs of hunger. Exercise and stay in good health. Being healthy and fit when Z-day comes could very well be the best survival choice you could make!</p>
<p>Stay alert. Stay alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse L</title>
		<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-26739</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/#comment-26739</guid>
		<description>I think that the only people that are capable of surviving are the ones that are prepared, such as the people that use this site and others like it.  If we don't stay informed we will most likely be totally unprepared for a zombie apocalypse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the only people that are capable of surviving are the ones that are prepared, such as the people that use this site and others like it.  If we don&#8217;t stay informed we will most likely be totally unprepared for a zombie apocalypse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZzDeuceX</title>
		<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-13829</link>
		<dc:creator>ZzDeuceX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/#comment-13829</guid>
		<description>It is not the whole of the brain that functions, but the frontal loba and the madula oblongata(although weakly) in the back. This is what causes the drop in intelligence. Zombies would be slow because their muscles can no longer repair themselves and would breakdown at a faster rate than ours. During the first hour, or even day, we may deal with fast moving zombies, but afterward the constant moving at maximum speed would slow them to little more than a crawl. Fresh zombies run, unless they are cold, deads get dead easy when their nine days old.(anyone catch that nursery rhyme?) Lets assume for a moment that we ARE dealing with relatively smart, fast moving, strong as they were the day thaey died Zombies. Thats little more than a massive riot. which anyone who has ever lived in detroit will tell you, they get put down pretty fast. Throw in the use of deadly force, and you have a pile of deader bodies in no time. Im not pro gung ho kick zombie ass guys, but I am anti-lets all assume the zombies just roll over us like were all a bunch of numb skulls like them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not the whole of the brain that functions, but the frontal loba and the madula oblongata(although weakly) in the back. This is what causes the drop in intelligence. Zombies would be slow because their muscles can no longer repair themselves and would breakdown at a faster rate than ours. During the first hour, or even day, we may deal with fast moving zombies, but afterward the constant moving at maximum speed would slow them to little more than a crawl. Fresh zombies run, unless they are cold, deads get dead easy when their nine days old.(anyone catch that nursery rhyme?) Lets assume for a moment that we ARE dealing with relatively smart, fast moving, strong as they were the day thaey died Zombies. Thats little more than a massive riot. which anyone who has ever lived in detroit will tell you, they get put down pretty fast. Throw in the use of deadly force, and you have a pile of deader bodies in no time. Im not pro gung ho kick zombie ass guys, but I am anti-lets all assume the zombies just roll over us like were all a bunch of numb skulls like them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-13187</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zombiesarecoming.com/2008/02/28/aftermath-population-zero/#comment-13187</guid>
		<description>As Im reading this I’ve noticed that most people, especially the uber gung-ho kill`emall folks, are assuming that the deadheads will be slow shuffling things that are only dangerous in a herd. So what Im wondering is, should we be contemplating, instead of weak little “infectios-violent-retardation” victims, that a small child good take with a bit of luck, the possibility that the Zeds will be fast deadly killing machines. After all, since we assume that deadheadness is caused by a virus, and evolution and survival of the fittest would lean towards the virus improving, at least temporary, the effectiveness of the host, so that it (the virus) might be spread further and faster, since they primary mode of transfer is through the bite. Also in this scenario there is no reason to assume reduced intelligence, just hampered judgment skills. What I mean is the zombie would still be smart enough to know guns hurt, but would still be savage enough to crave man flesh. I ask about the intelligence because brain damage kills, so that would imply the brain is more or less whole and functioning to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Im reading this I’ve noticed that most people, especially the uber gung-ho kill`emall folks, are assuming that the deadheads will be slow shuffling things that are only dangerous in a herd. So what Im wondering is, should we be contemplating, instead of weak little “infectios-violent-retardation” victims, that a small child good take with a bit of luck, the possibility that the Zeds will be fast deadly killing machines. After all, since we assume that deadheadness is caused by a virus, and evolution and survival of the fittest would lean towards the virus improving, at least temporary, the effectiveness of the host, so that it (the virus) might be spread further and faster, since they primary mode of transfer is through the bite. Also in this scenario there is no reason to assume reduced intelligence, just hampered judgment skills. What I mean is the zombie would still be smart enough to know guns hurt, but would still be savage enough to crave man flesh. I ask about the intelligence because brain damage kills, so that would imply the brain is more or less whole and functioning to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
